Noble Silence?
Thursday May 22, 2008

According to the Vimalakirti Nirdesa Sutra, The householder Vimalakirti once put a question to a large company of bodhisattvas. “Good sirs,” he said, “please explain how the bodhisattvas enter the Dharma-door of nonduality!”
In response this somewhat baffling question, Vimalakirti received thirty two answers (not one of which was that all one has to do is turn the Dharma-handle of nonduality and give the said door a bit of a shove). When they had given their answers, the gathered bodhisattvas turned to ask Manjusri for his opinion. The text reads as follows (in Robert Thurman’s translation):
Manjusri replied, “Good sirs, you have all spoken well. Nevertheless, all your explanations are themselves dualistic. To know no one teaching, to express nothing, to say nothing, to explain nothing, to announce nothing, to indicate nothing, and to designate nothing – that is the entrance into nonduality.”
Now I am sure that all of this is extremely clever. Or I imagine that it is, but I can’t be sure because I don’t really have a clue what any of it means. But the text doesn’t end here. Instead, it continues in this fashion:
Then the crown prince Manjusri said to the Licchavi Vimalakirti, “We have all given our own teachings, noble sir. Now, may you elucidate the teaching of the entrance into the principle of nonduality!”
Vimalakirti the householder now trumps Manjusri’s ace like this:
Thereupon, the Licchavi Vimalakirti kept his silence, saying nothing at all.
All of which reminds me of a nice story at the beginning of the book I was recently reading by Bernard Faure about four monks meditating in a mountain temple. In the story the temple lamps are about to burn out, so one monk cries, “Attendant! Raise the taper!” Another monks replies, “There is to be no talking in the hall of silence.” A third monk, annoyed at their speaking, mutters, “You have lost your senses.” Then a senior monk smiles smugly and says, “I alone have said nothing.”
So there you have it. Make of it what you will. But it is good to have broken my (almost certainly ignoble) silence of the last couple of weeks. And it’s nice to see you all again!
-
Today's Most Popular
Blogging as Practice: Tuesday September 27, 2005
Is blogging just an idle pursuit, or is it a form of practice? Thoughts from Seneca to Basho on the value of writing journals.
A Secular Age: Monday January 21, 2008
A review of Charles Taylor’s monumental book A Secular Age
One Man Bands: Thursday November 6, 2008
Girls Aloud and Buddhism. No, really…
Final Thoughts: Tuesday January 10, 2006
On planning your own funeral…
More on the Transhumanist Debate: Friday November 23, 2007
More on Marvin Minsky, Transhumanism and the New Scientist.
-
Related Articles
Difference: Wednesday August 9, 2006
The wisdom of difference and the wisdom of sameness…
Buddhism and Philosophy Part III - Practices of Wisdom and Love: Friday December 16, 2005
Philosophy: the love of wisdom… or the wisdom of love???
Blogging Philosophy Part II: Hanging Out with the Peasants: Friday January 30, 2009
Blogging, the Gutenberg parenthesis, and how to establish the colour of a bear.
Informed Ignorance, Spinoza and Science: Sunday September 2, 2007
Spionza, ignorance, understanding – all that, and I’m still two hundred miles from the nearest decent cappuccino.
Knowledge, Wisdom and Ignorance: Friday June 22, 2007
There is no such thing as esoteric wisdom.
-
Featured Articles
Zen, Brains and Making Friends With Your Own Head: 10 Nov, 2008
It’s a complicated business having a brain.
Lies in Which not Everything is False: 10 Sep, 2008
Stories – they are nothing but a pack of lies.
The Sutras of Abu Ghraib: 30 Oct, 2007
Aidan Delgado on Buddhism, ethics and the war in Iraq.
Baboon: 06 Jun, 2006
Feeling like a grumpy old baboon?
Meditation as Unphenomenology: 07 Feb, 2008
Meditation, cartography and the territory of the mind.
#1 · ramon sanchez
24 May 2008
hi will….enjoyed the monks story/joke…..dao that can be spoken is not the true dao. this is truish:: some things must be felt/experienced some things arent things…i just read .the zen doctrine of no mind..d.t.suzuki(highly recomended).’.from the first not a thing is’….didnt realise there was a zen that denies the way of meditation.(wouldnt accept being hit by zen master either)i enjoy(am habituated?)to meditating anyway so my opinion of non duality..is…………(:(:(:(:………………