Thursday May 22, 2008
According to the Vimalakirti Nirdesa Sutra, The householder Vimalakirti once put a question to a large company of bodhisattvas. “Good sirs,” he said, “please explain how the bodhisattvas enter the Dharma-door of nonduality!”
In response this somewhat baffling question, Vimalakirti received thirty two answers (not one of which was that all one has to do is turn the Dharma-handle of nonduality and give the said door a bit of a shove). When they had given their answers, the gathered bodhisattvas turned to ask Manjusri for his opinion. The text reads as follows (in Robert Thurman’s translation):
Manjusri replied, “Good sirs, you have all spoken well. Nevertheless, all your explanations are themselves dualistic. To know no one teaching, to express nothing, to say nothing, to explain nothing, to announce nothing, to indicate nothing, and to designate nothing – that is the entrance into nonduality.”
Now I am sure that all of this is extremely clever. Or I imagine that it is, but I can’t be sure because I don’t really have a clue what any of it means. But the text doesn’t end here. Instead, it continues in this fashion:
Then the crown prince Manjusri said to the Licchavi Vimalakirti, “We have all given our own teachings, noble sir. Now, may you elucidate the teaching of the entrance into the principle of nonduality!”
Vimalakirti the householder now trumps Manjusri’s ace like this:
Thereupon, the Licchavi Vimalakirti kept his silence, saying nothing at all.
All of which reminds me of a nice story at the beginning of the book I was recently reading by Bernard Faure about four monks meditating in a mountain temple. In the story the temple lamps are about to burn out, so one monk cries, “Attendant! Raise the taper!” Another monks replies, “There is to be no talking in the hall of silence.” A third monk, annoyed at their speaking, mutters, “You have lost your senses.” Then a senior monk smiles smugly and says, “I alone have said nothing.”
So there you have it. Make of it what you will. But it is good to have broken my (almost certainly ignoble) silence of the last couple of weeks. And it’s nice to see you all again!
Comments are turned off for this article.
Today's Most Popular
Politics: Friday May 5, 2006
The relationship between Buddhism and politics
Ram Bomjon - the New Buddha?: Tuesday November 22, 2005
Is the fifteen year old Nepalese boy, Ram Bomjon, the new Buddha, or is there more afoot?
Slippery truths: Wednesday December 10, 2008
Toughts on Mark Siderits’s Empty Persons.
The Woal of It: Friday December 8, 2006
Hiedegger, Riddley Walker, and how to make friends with your own head.
Violence and the Mind's Climate: Monday May 14, 2007
Does media violence unbalance the mind’s delicate climate?
Buddhism and Philosophy Part III - Practices of Wisdom and Love: Friday December 16, 2005
Philosophy: the love of wisdom… or the wisdom of love???
Mystery: Saturday December 20, 2008
Mysteriousness, mysticism and the sciences.
Difference: Wednesday August 9, 2006
The wisdom of difference and the wisdom of sameness…
Informed Ignorance, Spinoza and Science: Sunday September 2, 2007
Spionza, ignorance, understanding – all that, and I’m still two hundred miles from the nearest decent cappuccino.
Just War: Thursday March 20, 2008
Five years in Iraq, and the crassness of Prince Harry’s headgear.
Zen, Brains and Making Friends With Your Own Head: 10 Nov, 2008
It’s a complicated business having a brain.
Lies in Which not Everything is False: 10 Sep, 2008
Stories – they are nothing but a pack of lies.
The Sutras of Abu Ghraib: 30 Oct, 2007
Aidan Delgado on Buddhism, ethics and the war in Iraq.
Baboon: 06 Jun, 2006
Feeling like a grumpy old baboon?
Meditation as Unphenomenology: 07 Feb, 2008
Meditation, cartography and the territory of the mind.