Tuesday August 19, 2008
This morning I simply could not get down to work. I listened to the radio, I wrote a few words, I spent far too long looking online for obscure texts about banditry in nineteenth century Bulgaria (it’s called research, don’t you know…) and when that was all too much, I hung out with the cat, who has mastered the art of doing sod all to an awesome degree.
What I need, perhaps, is the intervention of a perpetually smiling, horribly efficient productivity guru who can overhaul my working practices and turn me into some kind of 21st-century multi-tasking wizard. Or I simply need a brain upgrade… And that suggestion brings me to the subject of neuroethics, the place where neuroscience meets ethics. Neuroethics is a fascinating emerging field, one that works in two directions. On the one hand it concerns the ethics of neuroscience – for example, What are the ethics of ‘upgrading’ the brain pharmaceutically? or, What bearing does our deeper understanding of the brain have on our notions of impaired states of consciousness such as that of coma? – and on the other hand it concerns the neuroscience of ethics – What does our developing understanding of the brain say about the way we think about ethics?
This is fascinating territory, and although the latter kind of question is to me the more interesting of the two, questions of the former kind are, I suspect, going to become more and more important as technology improves. But rather than going into the subject in any great detail here, I want to just post a link to my review of Walter Glannon’s book Defining Right and Wrong in Brain Science, published on the Metapsychology Online website. The book is a thoroughly worthwhile read, covering some at least of the major issues at stake, even though most of the essays in the volume work within a somewhat circumscribed conception of ethics – ethics, in at least some of the essays gathered in this book, can seem to be reducible to the question of what I can get away with.
To return to my lack of productivity this morning, however… whilst upgrades are all very well, I have to add that I’m not sure that I would be first in the queue if it came to handing out pills to increase my productivity. There is much to be said, after all, for hanging out with one’s cat and doing sod all.
Comments are turned off for this article.
Today's Most Popular
In Praise of Emmanuel Levinas: Thursday November 2, 2006
The 100th anniversary of the philosopher of ethics and responsibility, Emmanuel Levinas.
Buddhism for Pets: Thursday June 15, 2006
Inspire your dog with readings from the Dhammapada… No, really…
Longing for Certainty: Meditation Book Review: Friday July 29, 2005
Bhikkhu Nyanasobhano’s poetic reflections on meditation.
Just War: Thursday March 20, 2008
Five years in Iraq, and the crassness of Prince Harry’s headgear.
The Buddha and the Sahibs: Review: Monday August 1, 2005
Charles Allen goes in pursuit of the British orientalists
On Moral Evolutionism: Wednesday July 26, 2006
Are we better than we used to be? Are we worse? Thoughts on morality and history.
Groundlessness, not Relativism: Monday April 16, 2007
Thinking ethics without grounds…
Effervescence: Thursday September 30, 2010
A few notes on Ernst Bloch’s “The Principle of Hope”
The Invisibility of Goodness: Tuesday July 7, 2009
Maybe we’re not doing that badly after all…
Altruism, selfishness and purity: Saturday September 5, 2009
Can there ever be such a thing as pure altruism?
Zen, Brains and Making Friends With Your Own Head: 10 Nov, 2008
It’s a complicated business having a brain.
Lies in Which not Everything is False: 10 Sep, 2008
Stories – they are nothing but a pack of lies.
The Sutras of Abu Ghraib: 30 Oct, 2007
Aidan Delgado on Buddhism, ethics and the war in Iraq.
Baboon: 06 Jun, 2006
Feeling like a grumpy old baboon?
Meditation as Unphenomenology: 07 Feb, 2008
Meditation, cartography and the territory of the mind.