Wednesday February 16, 2011
“Un récit? Non, pas de récits, plus jamais” the writer and philosopher Maurice Blanchot once wrote: “A story? No, no stories. Never again.” Yet when Blanchot wrote these words, he could not avoid the fact that they were already a part of a story, that even in invoking the idea of “never again” he was already narrating, already spinning yarns.
The latest book by writer, philosopher and Zen practitioner David Loy, The World is Made of Stories plays with precisely these kinds of paradoxes. “The world is made of our accounts of it because we never grasp the world as it is in itself, apart from stories about it,” Loy writes; and this slim book – which is presented less as an argument and more as a kind of free-form meditation – attempts not only to unpick the place that stories have within our lives, but also to say something about the “No, no stories,” towards which Blanchot gestures, about those curious territories where stories no longer have any purchase on us.
Loy’s book is structured around a series of quotes that range from Buddhist philosopher Nāgārjuna to Lord Voldemort, and that are interspersed with terse, aphoristic reflections. This is, quite deliberately, a collage more than it is an argument. Nevertheless some of the questions that Loy opens up along the way are interesting ones: What does it mean to say the world is made of stories? Where do stories end? Do we own our stories? Do we fashion them or do they (as Dan Dennett claims) instead fashion us?
One of the strengths of Loy’s book is that he draws his reflections not only from his extensive knowledge of both Western and Asian philosophy, but also – as a committed Zen practitioner – from his experience of meditation. Meditation is of particular interest in thinking about narrative because – as I myself wrote here on this website a few weeks back – in meditation it becomes apparent that the body tells no stories. Meditation could be seen as a kind of practice of awareness without any overarching story, or even as a practice of – temporarily at least – un-storying ourselves. Of course, this is what makes meditation so damnably hard to talk about: the moment that we attempt to talk about this curious absence of stories in meditation, we find ourselves telling tales again. But one of the reasons meditation is powerful, I have come to increasingly suspect, is that it allows us to slip the bonds of the habitual stories that we tell; and this relative looseness in relation to stories is something that might allow us the flexibility to find new tales to tell about the world and about our place in it. Meditation, in other words, might be able to give us a certain leeway, a suppleness when it comes to the moving between the various possible tales; and as such it might help us to navigate – as I suggest in my own Finding Our Sea-Legs – the sea of stories on which we fid ourselves. Loy’s book, in particular the early sections, has some terrific passages on this weaving and unweaving of stories and selves.
There is much, then, that is suggestive and interesting here. Nevertheless, there is along the way much that is obscure and puzzling. The danger of writing in an aphoristic style is that aphorisms can often teeter dangerously between the insightful and the trite. What, for example, are we to make of “God needs us as much as we need God. We need God because we are God’s stories. God needs us because we are God’s way to make new kinds of stories”? It sounds neat, perhaps; but on closer inspection it seems hard to work out what is going on here. Perhaps Loy is saying that humans, in general, tend to weave tales about God or gods; but that in these tales that we tend to weave, we often tell of how these various gods are the ones that weave us. Or perhaps he is saying something rather different. It is hard to tell. This ambiguity is no doubt deliberate; and perhaps it is down to us to tell our own stories about the suggestive stories that Loy himself is weaving. But at the same time, this kind of thing has to it the faint air of mystical hokum.
There is, however, a larger problem with Loy’s approach to the question of stories, and it is in the passage on meditation that this problem begins to become apparent. It is whilst he is exploring the realm of “no more stories” – the curious nature of experience in which there is no storytelling about experience – that Loy invokes a term that becomes central to his book: no-thing-ness. When letting go of all stories in meditation, Loy writes, I become “no-thing”. And about this no-thing, nothing can be said, for to speak of it is to betray it by telling tales about it. This, it seems to me, is where the real trouble starts. As the book goes on, this no-thing-ness becomes elevated to ever greater heights: it transcends all situations in which I might find myself, it is perpetually free and unbound, it is not subject to death (I can neither say that my no-thing-ness survives death nor can I say that it does not survive, because both ways I’m making a category error. This no-thing-ness is unborn, uncreated, unproduced. How then could it die, be dismantled or destroyed?). But it is precisely this no-thing-ness, Loy writes, that is “our essential nature.”
This is Loy’s jumping-off point for an elaborate story of his own. “We want to believe that there is a transcendent plot, an all-encompassing storyline that makes sense of everything, that will (or can) have a happy ending,” he writes at one point. Maybe so; but this transcendent plot seems, in the end, precisely what this book is providing. And what a curious tale it is: a kind of mystical hotch-potch in which Sartre rubs shoulders with gnosticism, psychotherapy with Advaita Vedanta, in which we are, each of us, parts of a “cosmic evolutionary process”, and in which the problems that confront us – personal problems, environmental problems, political problems – might be overcome by responding to the “divine influx.” The book ends with a kind of mystic’s call-to-arms. “If the world is made of stories,” Loy writes, “who know what our best stories might accomplish? If we ourselves are Buddha, who but us can create the Pure Land?”
Of course, Loy is a subtle enough thinker to know that this all-encompassing tale he is weaving, too, is Just Another Story. It is just that, when it comes down to it, I’m not sure how persuasive, how plausible, or how humanly useful, this particular kind of story actually is.
Comments are turned off for this article.
Today's Most Popular
Pick and Mix: Friday August 26, 2011
Western Buddhists and the spiritually sweet-toothed.
Real Magic: Monday November 19, 2007
Where is the real magic?
Gautama Buddha: Interview with Vishvapani Blomfield: Wednesday December 7, 2011
Myth and history in the biography of the Buddha…
Wouldn't it be a lovely headline?: Saturday August 15, 2009
Finding heaven in a MacDonald’s hamburger? Even William Blake might struggle…
The Lure of the Cloister?: Friday August 17, 2007
Where are the secular cloisters?
This Material Frame...: Tuesday November 8, 2005
More on materialism!
Not seeing the trees for the wood...: Thursday July 5, 2007
Attention, meditation and some tasty chocolate muffins.
Life Without Free Will: Friday September 1, 2006
The lights are on, but there’s nobody at home…
Idleness: Sunday May 21, 2006
The virtues of laziness.
Slip Slidin' Away: Thursday March 19, 2009
Thoughts on experience
Zen, Brains and Making Friends With Your Own Head: 10 Nov, 2008
It’s a complicated business having a brain.
Lies in Which not Everything is False: 10 Sep, 2008
Stories – they are nothing but a pack of lies.
The Sutras of Abu Ghraib: 30 Oct, 2007
Aidan Delgado on Buddhism, ethics and the war in Iraq.
Baboon: 06 Jun, 2006
Feeling like a grumpy old baboon?
Meditation as Unphenomenology: 07 Feb, 2008
Meditation, cartography and the territory of the mind.